The European society of cardiology recently published the results of their survey on remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The aim of the survey was to get insight into the current use of remote monitoring (RM) of CIEDs in Europe. Responses were received from 54 centres belonging to the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) electrophysiological (EP) research network.
Some interesting results: a total of 76.5% of the centres reported that they are actively using remote monitoring. RM is most used for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and rarely or never used for routine pacemaker checkups, because the latter seems to be less cost-effective.
In 29,8% of the European centres, the delay between detection of an abnormality by RM systems and the physician’s response is within 24h.
The face-to-face 6-month check-up visits are drastically reduced by RM. Only 17.6% of all centers perform internet check-ups at predefined intervals.
Some areas for improvement.
In only 6.4% of the cases information obtained by RM is incorporated into the clinical patient file! Why is that?
Also in 25% of the centres, there is no specific workflow designed for RM. Only with a clear workflow follow-up and registration of the findings is possible.
Almost 40% of the patients reported to prefer RM as their main follow-up management, because it helps to avoid unnecessary visits to the hospital.
We believe RM will become more and more accustomed! For the 23.5% of the centres that not use RM; let’s make it happen!
Source: Europace Oxfordjournals